W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > November 2002

Re: docsync: RDF URI Reference

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: 04 Nov 2002 17:08:23 -0600
To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1036451304.11220.5264.camel@dirk>

On Mon, 2002-11-04 at 16:53, Brian McBride wrote:
[...]
> That is currently how I see things, but I'm open to better suggestions.

I don't think I'm happy about that, but I'm not sure I want
to put getting happy in the critical path just now.

My preference is that our docs say that RDF depends normatively
on RFC2396 and xml:base and does resource="" per our tests,
and that this is all consistent.

But I'm not the editor, so I'll leave it to the editors to
do their best in this round (keeping in mind that my support
to go to last call is contingent on how it all turns out).

What's become 100% clear to me is that we have a
couple things to explicitly double-check at
last call:

 -- confirmation from RDF Core that we're xml-base-happy
	(or that they agree that whatever inconsistencies
	we come up with are merited)

 -- some sort of confirmation that our spec is consistent
	with the URI spec (from Roy and/or other participants
	in uri@w3.org) as well

	(or that they agree that whatever inconsistencies
	we come up with are merited)

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Monday, 4 November 2002 18:08:58 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:53:57 EDT