W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > November 2002

Re: Issuette for tomorrow's aggenda

From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 09:15:18 +0200
Message-ID: <002b01c28176$6f373bd0$2380720a@NOE.Nokia.com>
To: "w3c-rdfcore-wg" <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>, "ext Brian McBride" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: <timbl@w3.org>



[Patrick Stickler, Nokia/Finland, (+358 40) 801 9690, patrick.stickler@nokia.com]


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "ext Brian McBride" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
To: "Patrick Stickler" <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>; "w3c-rdfcore-wg" <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Cc: <timbl@w3.org>
Sent: 31 October, 2002 23:41
Subject: Re: Issuette for tomorrow's aggenda


> At 22:39 31/10/2002 +0200, Patrick Stickler wrote:
> 
> >Brian,
> >
> >Could you please add the issue of ^^ per
> >
> >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Oct/0592.html
> >
> >to the list of "issuettes" to be discussed.
> 
> Hi Patrick,
> 
> My first reaction is Tim has dipped into this conversation not having the 
> full context and we need to figure whether there is a simple 
> misunderstanding here or a substantive issue.  We had a definite answer to 
> your question from DanC at the last telecon.  If Tim disagrees, then we 
> ought to explore that, but he might have been misunderstood.
> 
> So, I suggest, before we get all excited, we figure out if there is an 
> issue and exactly what it is.
> 
> Last week on email and in the telecon you asked DanC a straight question 
> about N3.  You got a firm and definitive answer.  You now think that Tim's 
> post suggests he has a different view.  Fair enough.  Why not ask Tim your 
> question.
> 
> Brian

Fair enough.

Tim, are you suggesting that 

   "foo"^^some:Datatype

is syntactic sugar for 

   [ some:Datatype "foo" ]

???

Patrick
Received on Friday, 1 November 2002 02:15:31 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:53:55 EDT