W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > May 2002

Re: test cases needing review

From: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 16:45:35 +0100
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20020530153947.0330c0c0@joy.songbird.com>
To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: rdf Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>, Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>

At 05:55 PM 5/29/02 +0100, Brian McBride wrote:

>Folks,
>
>We need to get some of the outstanding test cases reviewed.  Please can 
>you take a look at
>
>   http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/allTestCases.html


OK, I've been through all the outstanding cases - my comments are 
below.   I don't think that any are wrong, but I've raised comments in some 
cases.


http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about/test2.rdf
http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about/test2.nt
-- I agree with the UTF-8 mapping &#xFC; --> %C3%BC
-- Does agreement on this transform depend on current IRI debates (I've 
lost track)?  If we are agreed to have all URIs in the graph use just 
URI-character-sequences then I think this is right.


http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-reification-required/test001.rdf
http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-reification-required/test001.nt
-- Looks OK to me.


http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-uri-substructure/test001.rdf
http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-uri-substructure/test001.nt
-- Looks OK to me, but I'm not sure what it's meant to demonstrate.


http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-xmllang/test001.rdf
http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-xmllang/test001.nt
-- Did we agree xml"foo" as the form for XML literals in N-triples?  If so, 
it looks OK to me.


http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-xmllang/test002.rdf
http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-xmllang/test002.nt
-- ditto regarding xml"chat"-fr


http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-xmllang/test003.rdf
http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-xmllang/test003.nt
-- Looks OK to me.


http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-xmllang/test004.rdf
http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-xmllang/test004.nt
-- ditto regarding "chat"-fr


http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-xmllang/test005.rdf
http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-xmllang/test005.nt
-- Looks OK to me.


http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-xmllang/test006.rdf
http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-xmllang/test006.nt
-- Interesting case (i.e. good test case!):  does xml:lang apply to 
attributes of the element to which it is applied?  XML says yes, but that 
means that the language applies to multiple RDF properties specified as 
attributes.  I think that's all OK.


http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-abouteach/error001.rdf
-- I agree with this (rdf:aboutEach is now an error).  Does the group?


http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-abouteach/error002.rdf
-- ditto


http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-parseType/error001.rdf
-- I agree with this.


http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-parseType/error002.rdf
-- I agree with this.


http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-parseType/error003.rdf
-- I agree with this.


http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfs-container-membership-superProperty/not1P.rdf
http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfs-container-membership-superProperty/not1C.rdf
-- I agree with this.  (It would help if the test file contained its URL)


http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-uri-substructure/error001.nt
-- I agree with this.


http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-duplicate-member-props/test001.rdf
http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-duplicate-member-props/test001.nt
-- Hmmm... I agree that it should be allowed as legal RDF, but is there a 
case for producing a warning is repeated rdf:_n properties are used?


http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure/test001.rdf
http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure/test001.nt
-- I agree with this.


http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure/test002.rdf
http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure/test002.nt
-- I agree with this.  But don't these cases duplicate xmllang tests?  Does 
it matter?


http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure/test003.rdf
http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure/test003.nt
-- I agree with this.  (I never noticed xml:space before!)
(Should there be additional test cases with multiple consecutive whitespace 
and leading/trailing whitespace with and without the xml:space='preserve' 
attribute?)


http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure/test004.rdf
http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure/test004.nt
-- I agree with this.


http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure/test005.rdf
http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure/test005.nt
-- I agree with this.


http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/xmlbase/error001.rdf
-- I agree with this.


http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfs-domain-and-range/test003.rdf
http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfs-domain-and-range/test003.nt
-- I agree with this, but can't see what it's supposed to be testing.  Also 
there appears to be some filename confusion with the RDFS entailment tests.


http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfs-domain-and-range/test004.rdf
http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfs-domain-and-range/test004.nt
-- I agree with this, and note there appears to be continuing filename 
confusion.


http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfs-domain-and-range/test001.nt
http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfs-domain-and-range/test002.nt
http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfs-domain-and-range/test003.nt
http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfs-domain-and-range/test004.nt
-- I agree with this.


http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfs-subPropertyOf-semantics/test001.nt
http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfs-subPropertyOf-semantics/test002.nt
-- I agree with this.

#g



-------------------
Graham Klyne
<GK@NineByNine.org>
Received on Thursday, 30 May 2002 11:34:13 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:48:16 EDT