W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > May 2002

Re: The place of rdfs:Literal's in the world...

From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 10:38:10 +0300
To: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>, Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
CC: RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <B8F6C792.145F4%patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
On 2002-05-02 10:32, "ext Patrick Stickler" <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
wrote:

>>> The latest Schema draft says:
>>> 
>>> rdfs:Literal     This represents the set of atomic values,
>>                 eg. textual strings.
>>> and
>>> 
>>> rdfs:Literal
>>> 
>>> rdfs:Literal represents the self-denoting nodes called the 'literals' in the
>>> RDF graph structure. Atomic values such as textual strings are examples of
>>> RDF literals.
>> 
>> Oh dear. It shouldn't say things like that. (Rats, something else to
>> read and review. )
> 
> OK, this may be the source of my misunderstanding.

Would it be reasonable to say something along the lines that, all
'things' that are denoted by literal nodes in the graph are members
of the class rdfs:Literal?

Patrick

--
               
Patrick Stickler              Phone: +358 50 483 9453
Senior Research Scientist     Fax:   +358 7180 35409
Nokia Research Center         Email: patrick.stickler@nokia.com
Received on Thursday, 2 May 2002 03:35:07 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:48:13 EDT