- From: Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
- Date: Wed, 01 May 2002 05:59:01 +0100
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Cc: RDF core WG <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
At 07:17 PM 4/30/02 -0400, Dan Brickley wrote: >I'm off to >Hawaii for WWW2002 shortly, and will be taking a little break from RDFS >the next 2-3 weeks, but I do think you raise a number of points worthy of >discussion. I wasn't expecting my comments to get this round. Have fun in the sun! > The notion of restriction in RDF needs better presentation. >This is connected to the removal of the 'constraint' vocabulary from RDFS. >I believe range and domain do restrict the interpretations of the RDF >graph (in the MT sense), Agreed (in the sense that *any* RDF statement restructs the interpretations of a graph). >but they can't be read as restricting in the XML >Schema / DTD validity sense. Quite. I try to view them as enlarging (the amount of information one has) rather than limiting. #g ------------------- Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
Received on Wednesday, 1 May 2002 01:20:42 UTC