W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > March 2002

RE: motivation for bNodes/existentials in RDF; note for parsers

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 16:27:45 +0000
Message-Id: <>
To: "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, "Patrick Stickler" <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>, "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>, "Pat Hayes" <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
Cc: "RDF Core" <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>, "Massimo Marchiori" <massimo@w3.org>, "Lynn Andrea Stein" <las@olin.edu>
At 09:58 25/03/2002 +0000, Jeremy Carroll wrote:

>PS: As an implementator I am certainly game for implementing something along
>these lines, and I think a URI scheme is better than extensions of a
>well-known URI.

If we are going to call it a URI it had better be a  URI.  Does the 'U' in 
URI stand for uniform and does that mean multiple occurences of a URI must 
denote the same thing regardless of context?

Received on Monday, 25 March 2002 11:30:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:53:56 UTC