RE: motivation for bNodes/existentials in RDF; note for parsers

At 09:58 25/03/2002 +0000, Jeremy Carroll wrote:
[...]

>PS: As an implementator I am certainly game for implementing something along
>these lines, and I think a URI scheme is better than extensions of a
>well-known URI.

If we are going to call it a URI it had better be a  URI.  Does the 'U' in 
URI stand for uniform and does that mean multiple occurences of a URI must 
denote the same thing regardless of context?

Brian