W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > March 2002

Re: [ratholes, reification, risk] poison-URIref testcases

From: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 12:48:35 +0000
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20020325124706.00a4cec0@joy.songbird.com>
To: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
At 12:29 PM 3/25/02 +0000, Jan Grant wrote:
>This is, surprise, going down a rathole fast, so this is my last pulic
>post on the topic...

OK.

>A better bet (I think) is to just do something Herbrandish - that is,
>keep the current definition of "interpretation"; if you _do_ wind up
>with one of Dan's problematical graphs (that is, one with a URI-labelled
>node with no "meaning", ie, which doesn't denote anything*), you don't
>really hurt yourself by letting it denote some mathematical figment that
>doesn't collide with anything else.

That sounds very like what I was trying to say.

#g


-------------------
Graham Klyne
<GK@NineByNine.org>
Received on Monday, 25 March 2002 07:43:09 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:46:22 EDT