W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > March 2002

Re: RDF/XML's legal status (was: application/rdf+xml ...)

From: Frank Manola <fmanola@mitre.org>
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2002 21:31:27 -0500
Message-ID: <3C9D3A7F.2060900@mitre.org>
To: Aaron Swartz <me@aaronsw.com>
CC: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>, Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@mimesweeper.com>, RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Aaron--

If someone wants to perform this "experiment", I'd suggest we do it in 
the US, and line up the American Civil Liberties Union ahead of time to 
help.  Freedom of (machine-readable) speech should be our line.

--Frank

Aaron Swartz wrote:

> On 2002-03-23 5:17 AM, "Jan Grant" <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk> wrote:
> 
> 
>>>>   It is important to note that RDF language is used to transmit
>>>>   meaningful information, and thus has the same legal status as
>>>>   assertions, in say, English would.
>>>>
>>>I strongly suggest dropping this last paragraph.  If there's anything
>>>likely to snarl up approval through IETF/IESG/IANA processes, I think this
>>>is it.  And it's not necessary to make this point for registering the
>>>content type.
>>>
>>I'd agree with Graham here; actually, I'd go further. RDF does _not_
>>have the same legal status as written English assertions until test
>>cases say it does.
>>
> 
> Test cases, hm. Anyone wanna volunteer to get sued? ;-)
> 
> 


-- 
Frank Manola                   The MITRE Corporation
202 Burlington Road, MS A345   Bedford, MA 01730-1420
mailto:fmanola@mitre.org       voice: 781-271-8147   FAX: 781-271-875
Received on Monday, 25 March 2002 00:47:00 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:46:21 EDT