W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > March 2002

Re: XML Base

From: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 10:54:04 +0000 (GMT)
To: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
cc: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, w3c-rdfcore-wg <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.44.0203221052521.12799-100000@mail.ilrt.bris.ac.uk>
On Fri, 22 Mar 2002, Dave Beckett wrote:

> >>>Jeremy Carroll said:
> <snip/>
> > I am arguing a catch 22, if you want to delete these, it is because some
> > people disagree with them, which is why we need them. I am happy with
> > deleting the ones that nobody disagrees with.
> <snip/>
> The only one that wasn't approved was test017/error001 and that is
> because I think the algorithm for resolving the URI was wrong in the
> proposed test017.nt
> I think resolving
>   base URI "mailto:Jeremy_Carroll@hp.com"
>   with URI "relfile"
> will give
>   URI "mailto:relfile"
> not
>   URI "mailto:/refile"
> because mailto is a non-hierachical URI scheme (does not start
> mailto:/ so can be detected by apps).

Isn't there a canonical answer for this in the definition of the mailto:
prefix? If not, this needs flagging up for TAG or appropriate body to
find an answer to (even if it's "undefined") and the resolution of this
changed to match.

jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/
Tel +44(0)117 9287088 Fax +44 (0)117 9287112 RFC822 jan.grant@bris.ac.uk
"NOP" is a trivial implementation of an executable Z subset.
Received on Friday, 22 March 2002 05:56:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:53:56 UTC