W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > March 2002

Re: xml literal and xslt

From: Mike Dean <mdean@bbn.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 10:44:16 -0500
Message-Id: <200203131544.KAA08521@cam-mbx1.bbn.com>
To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
cc: "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org, mdean@bbn.com
> One thing to bear in mind is DAML's requirements.  Should we consider cases
> where a daml:unambiguousProperty and a daml property with cardinality
> constraints take parseType=Literal values.

DAML+OIL currently requires that an UnambiguousProperty be
an ObjectProperty, so literal values aren't an issue.

Thanks for thinking of us, though :-).

	Mike
Received on Wednesday, 13 March 2002 10:50:03 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:46:17 EDT