W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > March 2002

Re: 2002-02-25#19, Fragment identifiers, words for the primer

From: Aaron Swartz <me@aaronsw.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 13:18:54 -0600
To: Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
CC: RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <B8B3B0BE.27694%me@aaronsw.com>
On 2002-03-12 1:11 PM, "Graham Klyne" <GK@NineByNine.org> wrote:

>> This contradicts some readings of the URI specification[RFC2396], so caution
>> is recommended when creating new RDF terms which use fragment identifiers.
> I think that's too strong, on two counts "contradicts" and
> "caution".

It may be strong but I believe it's true (I'm interested in evidence to the

Your on the other hand is false, or is at least misleading. (Specifically
your claim that RFC2396 focuses on document retrieval. It is very clear
about describing URIs in the abstract sense.)

[ "Aaron Swartz" ; <mailto:me@aaronsw.com> ; <http://www.aaronsw.com/> ]
Received on Tuesday, 12 March 2002 14:18:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:53:56 UTC