Modifying Graham's version: > In standard usage for web document retrieval, the representation accessed by > a URL with a fragment identifier is related to the representation accessed > by the URL alone, in a way that depends on the MIME type of the document > representation retrieved. However, in RDF, the thing identified by a URI > with fragment identifier does not bear any particular relationship to the > thing identified by the URI alone. Add: This contradicts some readings of the URI specification[RFC2396], so caution is recommended when creating new RDF terms which use fragment identifiers. And I'll be happy with this wording. -- "Aaron Swartz" | Semplesh <mailto:me@aaronsw.com> | <http://semplesh.com/> <http://www.aaronsw.com/> | soak up the informationReceived on Tuesday, 12 March 2002 11:24:51 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:46:16 EDT