- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 18:37:41 +0000
- To: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>, RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
At 21:00 08/03/2002 +0200, Patrick Stickler wrote
[...]
>Right? If that has changed, please tell me when, where and why.
>
>That's not to say that literals are not things in the universe,
>only that literals are not members of the RDF class rdfs:Resource.
>
>--
>
>If that hasn't changed, then...
http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-literalsubjects
Resolution: On the 15th February 2002, at the RDFCore WG telecon, the WG:
* resolved that the current syntaxes (RDF/XML, n-triples, graph
syntax) do not allow literals as subjects.
* noted that it is aware of no reason why literals should not be
subjects and a future WG with a less restrictive charter may extend the
syntaxes to allow literals as the subjects of statements.
Brian
Received on Monday, 11 March 2002 13:39:33 UTC