At 21:00 08/03/2002 +0200, Patrick Stickler wrote [...] >Right? If that has changed, please tell me when, where and why. > >That's not to say that literals are not things in the universe, >only that literals are not members of the RDF class rdfs:Resource. > >-- > >If that hasn't changed, then... http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-literalsubjects Resolution: On the 15th February 2002, at the RDFCore WG telecon, the WG: * resolved that the current syntaxes (RDF/XML, n-triples, graph syntax) do not allow literals as subjects. * noted that it is aware of no reason why literals should not be subjects and a future WG with a less restrictive charter may extend the syntaxes to allow literals as the subjects of statements. BrianReceived on Monday, 11 March 2002 13:39:33 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:46:16 EDT