W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > March 2002

RE: Proposed NTriples changes for literal notation

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 14:41:52 -0000
To: "Dave Beckett" <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>, "w3c-rdfcore-wg" <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <JAEBJCLMIFLKLOJGMELDKEEKCDAA.jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
> 
> Can't be (a) since the "" content is just a sequence of characters.

Oh, that's interesting. I had been assuming that it was well-balanced xml.

So for you

xml"<"

is a plausible value. (Not representable in RDF/XML)?

That's fine.
If that's the case then:

> b) legal but different from xml("<b>foo</b>") (and not representable in
> RDF/XML?)

looks like the attractive answer to my question.

Jeremy
Received on Monday, 11 March 2002 09:42:39 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:46:15 EDT