- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 14:41:52 -0000
- To: "Dave Beckett" <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>, "w3c-rdfcore-wg" <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
>
> Can't be (a) since the "" content is just a sequence of characters.
Oh, that's interesting. I had been assuming that it was well-balanced xml.
So for you
xml"<"
is a plausible value. (Not representable in RDF/XML)?
That's fine.
If that's the case then:
> b) legal but different from xml("<b>foo</b>") (and not representable in
> RDF/XML?)
looks like the attractive answer to my question.
Jeremy
Received on Monday, 11 March 2002 09:42:39 UTC