- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 14:20:33 -0000
- To: "Dave Beckett" <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>, "RDF Core" <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
- Cc: "Graham Klyne" <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
> This is any allowed xml:lang content as defined in
> http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml#sec-lang-tag
YES.
>
> ISSUE #2: I don't think specifying this more precisely here is
> worth it. If the consensus is to do this, it would be something
> like this (after RFC 1766):
> language ::= [a-zA-Z]{1,8} ('-' [a-zA-Z]{1,8})
>
NO, don't go there.
XML first edition did that, then RFC3066 updated RFC1766 and changed it
(digits are allowed in some places now).
I think XML first edition actually went further ...
Second edition fixed it by removing a load of rules.
Jeremy
Received on Monday, 11 March 2002 09:21:25 UTC