W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > March 2002

RE: xml literal and xslt (resend)

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 13:16:26 -0000
To: "Graham Klyne" <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
Cc: <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <JAEBJCLMIFLKLOJGMELDCEEICDAA.jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Graham:
>
> I'm bothered with all the solutions you propose --

Me too, the alternative is to specify less, and still leave room in which
implementations can differ.

>                                              XML schema uses qnames
> in attributes, so I think we'd ignore this at some risk.  The solution of
> using rdf:parseType="literal ns1 ns2 ..." doesn't seem to be XSLT-safe.

Why not?
I think XSLT preserves namespace prefixes (except when using the aliasing
mechanism).


>
> I find myself foundering on exactly what it means to be XSLT-safe:  it
> seems that any XSLT solution that naively extracts literal content is
> likely to fall foul if this goal.
>
Received on Monday, 11 March 2002 08:17:43 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:46:15 EDT