W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > March 2002


From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2002 18:00:13 -0000
To: <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>

Some doubt has been expressed whether this issue is in scope.

See M&S section 6 has text:

Two RDF strings are deemed to be the same if their ISO/IEC 10646
representations match. Each RDF application must specify which one of the
following definitions of 'match' it uses:

i.e. paras 217 - 219 (incl note)


This text has an explicit ambiguity which the early uniform normalization
model addresses.
Hence this issue is within the core purpose of this group to clarify M&S.

Received on Friday, 1 March 2002 13:00:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:53:56 UTC