- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2002 11:40:13 +0000
- To: Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
At 17:05 27/02/2002 -0600, Pat Hayes wrote: >Guys, I started drafting a new version of the MT to reflect our >staked-down decision that literals always denote themselves. This >simplifies (and clarifies) the graph syntax and the basic MT, but it >could be done in several different ways, so I wonder if anyone has any >strong views on any of the following question: should we allow literals to >entail bnodes ? Good to be thinking about this and collecting data. A couple of suggestions: o don't do too much work on it till we datatypes fully nailed; some issues did surface at the f2f. I'm afraid they are not done yet :( o great to ask such clear questions, but best to wait for a collective group decision before implementing them Brian
Received on Friday, 1 March 2002 06:41:56 UTC