>At the f2f one of the postponed issues that I wished to advocate >reopening was: > >http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-syntax-incomplete > >In particular, given the amount of change we have made I think a >small change to >rectify the bnode serialization problem should be considered. > >However we were out of time, and so I have decided to raise this by e-mail. > >This is primarily motivated for me by Jena development. >Within Jena we have repeated user requirement to enable round-tripping. > >e.g. one of our summer students yesterday said words like: "we use N-triple as >our transport becuase bNodes are important." > >Since we are not proposing N-triple as a standard, we do have some >obligation to >make RDF/XML useable. > >I propose that we should modify the RDF/XML syntax to permit bNode labels >"_:foo" wherever we currently permit URI refs. Would that be extendable to allow nodeIDs on literal nodes, also, to handle untidy literals? Pat -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- IHMC (850)434 8903 home 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola, FL 32501 (850)202 4440 fax phayes@ai.uwf.edu http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayesReceived on Friday, 28 June 2002 02:14:30 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:49:27 EDT