Re: Regarding my recent post: inquiry.txt

Thanks Frank  ;-)

Patrick


On 2002-06-20 15:03, "ext Frank Manola" <fmanola@mitre.org> wrote:

> 
> To be fair, I think some "contextual" information ought to be documented
> in the archive (which it will be when this message is archived):  while
> it may be reasonable to be concerned about certain "questionable
> language" appearing in WG email (and the archive), it needs to be
> understood that the "questionable" term was, in fact, used a fair bit in
> certain verbal discussions of examples at the RDF Core F2F, and thus it
> wasn't arbitrarily introduced into the discussion by Patrick (i.e.,
> Patrick was continuing in email a discussion that had started verbally).
> If the fact that the term was used in verbal discussion reflects badly
> on the WG, "TS" (you can contact me privately if you don't know what
> that means!)
> 
> --Frank
> 
> 
> Patrick Stickler wrote:
> 
>>     
>> Regarding
>> 
>>  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Jun/0181.html
>> 
>> Firstly, apologies for any offense caused by any content of that
>> message, and sincerest apologies to Brian for making him an unwilling
>> acomplice to my use of questionable language.
>> 
>> Even though the two questions with multiple choice answers did contain
>> a lame attempt at humor, I was actually quite serious about the form
>> in which the two entailments of concern are presented.
>> 
>> Thus, removing the fourth answer in both cases, I think they represent
>> an effective way to query the community about their expectations regarding
>> tidyness without forcing them to understand the brutal details.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>> Patrick
>> 
> 
> 

--
               
Patrick Stickler              Phone: +358 50 483 9453
Senior Research Scientist     Fax:   +358 7180 35409
Nokia Research Center         Email: patrick.stickler@nokia.com

Received on Thursday, 20 June 2002 07:55:17 UTC