W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > June 2002

Re: new semantics initiative

From: patrick hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 18:13:54 -0500
Message-Id: <p05111a15b930285fc976@[65.217.30.123]>
To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org

>At 12:07 12/06/2002 -0500, patrick hayes wrote:
>
>[...]
>
>>What is wrong with URI inspection?
>
>Questions:
>
>   o what uri prefix should be used?  Is it ok to insist on an http: prefix?

I would guess so. I would expect that it would be done the same way 
that the W3C handles the RDF and RDFS vocabulary, by a URL linking to 
a set-in-stone page.

>   o how will names in this namespace be allocated?

Do you mean how procedurally? Thats up the W3C. I would guess that a 
WG would submit some kind of application to some internal 
secretariat, or something like that. Isnt this kind of stuff all set 
out in the W3C process manual somewhere? For example, we are 
proposing to create an rdfd: namespace, right? Like that.

Pat


-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC					(850)322 0319   cell
40 South Alcaniz St.			(850)202 4416   office
Pensacola,  FL 32501			(850)202 4440   fax
Received on Friday, 14 June 2002 19:13:53 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:49:17 EDT