W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > June 2002

Re: datatyping unstaked

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: 14 Jun 2002 08:05:59 -0500
To: patrick hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <1024059960.14588.34.camel@dirk>

On Thu, 2002-06-13 at 22:04, patrick hayes wrote: 
> Still, there is no free lunch, and it does require 
> making some changes to the current RDF docs, particularly the MT, and 
> maybe some of the test cases.

That made me nervous...

And indeed,

> For example, the above graph does NOT entail
> <ex:Jenny> <ex:age> _:x .
> _:f <dc:title> _:x .
> _:f <rdf:type> <ex:movie> .

That kills it, for me.

That's the characteristic
I actually need about literals. It's no fun
saying they denote themselves if you can't
existentially generalize them.

i.e. this is just another form of untidy literals.

Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Friday, 14 June 2002 09:05:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:53:58 UTC