- From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 14:06:12 +0300
- To: ext Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@mimesweeper.com>
- CC: RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
On 2002-06-12 13:50, "ext Graham Klyne" <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
wrote:
> At 12:30 PM 6/12/02 +0300, Patrick Stickler wrote:
>> On 2002-06-12 11:48, "ext Graham Klyne" <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Fair point but easily fixed, I think. Replace "reserved namespaces" with
>>> "reserved URIrefs". If more detail is needed, designate these in terms of
>>> reserved URIref prefix strings.
>>
>> Looks like a job for rdfs:aboutEachPrefix ;-)
>
> Smiley noted, but I must emphasize that this is *not* a case for
> aboutEachPrefix.
>
> (The point about Pat/Guha's proposal is that the reservation must apply
> globally, not in response to something that pops up in the RDF graph. If a
> colouring mechanism is to appear in the graph then it must apply
> graph-syntactically to every affected triple.)
I fully agree. I was actually thinking along the lines of a shift
in its scope, whereby it is not a syntactic mechanism, but would
become a kind of meta-rule applicable to the entire graph. A kind
of log:implies but only allowing prefix matching in the premise.
But nevermind...
;-)
Patrick
--
Patrick Stickler Phone: +358 50 483 9453
Senior Research Scientist Fax: +358 7180 35409
Nokia Research Center Email: patrick.stickler@nokia.com
Received on Wednesday, 12 June 2002 07:02:01 UTC