W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > June 2002

Re: new semantics initiative

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 11:40:56 +0100
Message-Id: <>
To: patrick hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org


<shortVersion>Cool. I like it.  Why do we have to do it now? </shortversion>


To the extent that I understand it, I like the new structure that is being 
proposed.  It is intuitively appealing.  I also thank you for your efforts 
in clarifying the proposal before the face to face meeting.

I would like to see rapid comment on this idea from members of the WG.

 From procedural point of view, however, I am very concerned about 
introducing this into RDFCore at this late stage.

The primary motivation for this work is addressing the layering problem.  I 
can clearly see an argument that this problem is out of charter for this 
WG.  That argument is strengthened when you tell us that this proposal 
introduces a new semantics that is exactly equivalent to what we have 
now.  If this means that owl can be successfully layered on top, then I am 
absolutely delighted that we can proceed with our current semantics 
confident that the layering issue for owl, and other languages can be resolved.

I am also concerned to ensure that the webont folks don't feel that they 
are the victim of a flanking manoeuvre, where discussion of an issue of 
considerable import to them gets moved to another forum.

I am very keen to ensure that this promising work gets properly explored 
and discussed and will extend my efforts to ensure that happens in a proper 
manner.  However, the WG's current priorities are to get done with its 
current work.  May I remind everyone we are out of time.  Whilst I could be 
persuaded that the proper course for us is to address this now, I have seen 
no argument to justify that.  Whilst I will be guided as usual by the WG, I 
am currently minded to rule this out of scope and in that light, your 
efforts might be best employed completing work on the current model theory.

Received on Tuesday, 11 June 2002 07:25:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:53:58 UTC