- From: Aaron Swartz <me@aaronsw.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2002 17:43:17 -0500
- To: Eric Miller <em@w3.org>
- Cc: RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>, Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
On Monday, June 10, 2002, at 06:17 PM, Eric Miller wrote: > so to be clear, the suggestion is to add: Checking the DAML Crawler on how this property has been used in the past, I find the vast majority of statements using isDefinedBy are from the DCMI schemas or the OntoBroker schemas and are used in this fashion. However, there are some that aren't: <http://purl.org/net/swn#URI> rdfs:isDefinedBy <http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2396.txt> - http://infomesh.net/swns/util.rdf <dcq:RFC1766 rdf:parseType="Resource"> <rdf:value>en</rdf:value> <rdfs:label>English</rdfs:label> <rdfs:isDefinedBy rdf:resource="http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1766.txt" /> </dcq:RFC1766> - http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/SiRPAC-bugs/JUN-11-2001-1.rdf <http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/infoset/infosetUtil#EncName> rdfs:isDefinedBy <http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml#NT-EncName> . (and so on for each element...) - http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/infoset/infoset-diagram.rdf <http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/pim/contact#_nspolicy> rdfs:isDefinedBy <http://www.w3.org/1999/10/nsuri> . - http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/pim/contact.rdf <http://www.w3.org/Addressing/schemes#schemeName> rdfs:isDefinedBy <http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2396.txt> - http://www.w3.org/Addressing/schemes.rdf Just thought the WG should be informed, -- Aaron Swartz [http://www.aaronsw.com]
Received on Monday, 10 June 2002 18:43:20 UTC