Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-07-26 (rdfms-assertion)

Graham wrote:
>So my questions are:
>(a) is the proposed rewording (below) any clearer?
>(b) should I work in the example -- I'm thinking an edited version might
>appear as a new section 2.3.5, illustrating what has gone before.

I hope it's not disloyal to say that I prefer Pat's example to your text ...
I rather like (I think Brian's idea of) including Pat's example as a test
case rather than as an example in the WD.

Jeremy

Received on Wednesday, 31 July 2002 14:30:32 UTC