On Sunday, June 23, 2002, at 06:35 AM, Patrick Stickler wrote: >> Another question that comes to mind is whether we can have: [...] >> <Jenny> <ageInYearsDecimalNumeral> "10" . >> <John> <ageInYears> _:a . > > We have agreed that it is a desire of the WG not to have multiple > variant properties for the different idioms or lexical/value > interpretations. When did we agree on that? Not only is that an aesthetically broken solution (it encourages people to make the author / authorName confusion) it looks difficult if not impossible to deal with in a rules-based system like CWM. What's so bad about having two properties? -- Aaron Swartz [http://www.aaronsw.com] 4FAC4838B7D8D13FA6D92EDB4145521E79F0DF4B I will be in San Diego for the O'Reilly Open Source Convention the 24-26 July.Received on Thursday, 18 July 2002 11:12:59 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:49:51 EDT