I like it as well (but hope the explanation includes a clear statement that folks aren't supposed to actually use that notation in practice ;-) Cheers, Patrick On 2002-07-15 10:55, "ext Graham Klyne" <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com> wrote: > > At 04:26 PM 7/10/02 +0100, Brian McBride wrote: > >> It has been suggested that we adopt a common notation across all the specs >> for representing triples. >> >> I suggest we use legal n-triples with the addition that a URI can be >> represented as a qname without angle brackets, e.g. >> >> _:a rdf:type rdfs:Class . >> >> The notation should be explained in the primer which should include a list >> of standard prefixes. The other documents should reference the >> description in the primer. > > I like that (as a way of presenting triples for human consumption). > > #g > > > ------------------- > Graham Klyne > <GK@NineByNine.org> > > -- Patrick Stickler Phone: +358 50 483 9453 Senior Research Scientist Fax: +358 7180 35409 Nokia Research Center Email: patrick.stickler@nokia.comReceived on Monday, 15 July 2002 09:37:39 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:49:50 EDT