W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > July 2002

Re: editorial guideline: representing triples

From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 16:37:58 +0300
To: ext Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@mimesweeper.com>, Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
CC: RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <B958AAE6.18810%patrick.stickler@nokia.com>


I like it as well (but hope the explanation includes a clear
statement that folks aren't supposed to actually use that
notation in practice ;-)

Cheers,

Patrick


On 2002-07-15 10:55, "ext Graham Klyne" <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
wrote:

> 
> At 04:26 PM 7/10/02 +0100, Brian McBride wrote:
> 
>> It has been suggested that we adopt a common notation across all the specs
>> for representing triples.
>> 
>> I suggest we use legal n-triples with the addition that a URI can be
>> represented as a qname without angle brackets, e.g.
>> 
>>   _:a rdf:type rdfs:Class .
>> 
>> The notation should be explained in the primer which should include a list
>> of standard prefixes.  The other documents should reference the
>> description in the primer.
> 
> I like that (as a way of presenting triples for human consumption).
> 
> #g
> 
> 
> -------------------
> Graham Klyne
> <GK@NineByNine.org>
> 
> 

--
               
Patrick Stickler              Phone: +358 50 483 9453
Senior Research Scientist     Fax:   +358 7180 35409
Nokia Research Center         Email: patrick.stickler@nokia.com
Received on Monday, 15 July 2002 09:37:39 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:49:50 EDT