W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > July 2002

SOAP WDs

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2002 18:52:18 +0100
To: "RDF Core" <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <JAEBJCLMIFLKLOJGMELDGEEJCEAA.jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>



Looking at them, I am not much interested in these, (oh I haven't seen the graph
data model yet).

However I note their test 75:

http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-soap12-testcollection-20020626#T75

This has a relative URI being resolved against xml:base, we could ask what the
correct behaviour is if we replace the relative URI with a same document
reference ...

e.g.
<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope">
 <env:Header>
  <test:echoResolvedRef xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
        env:role="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope/role/next"
        env:mustUnderstand="1">
    <test:RelativeReference xml:base="http://example.org/today.xml"
          xlink:href="#frag"
          xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" />
  </test:echoResolvedRef>
 </env:Header>
 <env:Body>
 </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

I would guess ...

<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope">
 <env:Header>
  <test:responseResolvedRef xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests">
    http://example.org/today.xml#frag
  </test:resonseResolvedRef>
 </env:Header>
 <env:Body>
 </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>



(Wickedly)

Jeremy
Received on Friday, 5 July 2002 13:52:34 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:49:49 EDT