- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2002 14:13:52 +0100
- To: "Brian McBride" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, "RDF Core" <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
> Consider > > _:b1 rdf:type rdf:Seq . > _:b1 rdf:_1 "10" . > _:b2 rdf:type rdf:Seq . > _:b2 rdf:_1 "10" . > > This would require that the first member of each sequence is the same. > My take is that global datatyping and containers of literals simply do not interoperate. Containers with literal values either are untyped or locally typed. I don't believe that any of the proposed global datatyping solutions (ever) work with containers. Hence I think: + test case A is a choice (the group seems minded to say that the entailment holds - I disagree but not strongly). + containers cannot contain globally typed literals (i.e. the literals are either self-denoting or untyped) + if test case A is true then rdf:object takes untyped literals as its object (Brian also mentioned the rdf:object problem in the telecon). Jeremy
Received on Monday, 1 July 2002 09:14:12 UTC