W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > January 2002

RE: Datatyping Summary V2

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 12:00:52 -0000
To: "Brian McBride" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, "Patrick Stickler" <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>, "RDF Core" <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <JAEBJCLMIFLKLOJGMELDKEPCCCAA.jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>

I responded to DanC on RDF-interest, RDF-logic

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-logic/2002Jan/0037.html

I started from Dan's most recent version of the problem and concluded:
   "TDL is backwards compatible and S isn't."

More to the point, on bended knee 

"Can't we just drop this one -- please, pretty, pretty please with a cherry
on top?"

we have done it to death.

Jeremy


> -----Original Message-----
> From: w3c-rdfcore-wg-request@w3.org
> [mailto:w3c-rdfcore-wg-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Brian McBride
> Sent: 31 January 2002 11:00
> To: Patrick Stickler; RDF Core
> Subject: Re: Datatyping Summary V2
> 
> 
> At 10:57 31/01/2002 +0200, Patrick Stickler wrote:
> 
> [...]
> from Sergey's.
> > > Under TDL, consider the graph:
> > >
> > >  _:f <rdf:type> <film> .
> > >  _:f <dc:Title> (_, "10") .
> > >  <mary> <age>   (_, "10").
> > >
> > > Does this entail:
> > >
> > >  _:x <dc:Title> ?y .
> > >  _:z <age>      ?y .
> > >
> > > I believe there is agreement that it does not under the 
> current TDL model
> > > theory.
> >
> >No. This is not correct.
> 
> I've just chatted to Jeremy, who tells me you and he have also 
> talked this 
> morning, that Jeremy will sending out you joint position on this 
> question soon.
> 
> Brian
> 
> 
Received on Thursday, 31 January 2002 07:00:49 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:44:04 EDT