Re: TDL conflicts with the "duh!" requirement

On 2002-01-29 1:35, "ext Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org> wrote:

> On Mon, 2002-01-28 at 15:42, Graham Klyne wrote:
>> At 06:53 AM 1/28/02 -0600, Dan Connolly wrote:
>>>> Two literals may be string equal, but not denote the same
>>>> value.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> That's one design choice. It's not the one I prefer,
>>> and it's not the way the S proposal works.
>> 
>> Just checking... I thought that was pretty much just how S works ... a
>> literal node denotes the corresponding string value.
> 
> yes...
> 
> But PatrickS suggested that two literals could be string-equal
> but denote different values. That is definitely *not*
> how S works. "abc" denotes the same thing as "abc". always.

Sergey, could you please clarify this for us?

Thanks,

Patrick

--
               
Patrick Stickler              Phone: +358 50 483 9453
Senior Research Scientist     Fax:   +358 7180 35409
Nokia Research Center         Email: patrick.stickler@nokia.com