Dan, Further to my last response on "Proposals? Re: use/mention and reification", I've reconsidered my position and started to sketch some revised proposals (attached). At this stage, I'd like to know that I'm not misrepresenting too badly the essence of your approach to N3 contexts and reification (section 3). The ideas here may represent a significant extension to the RDF language, so may be viewed as out of scope for discussion here. They certainly would need an extension to the RDF semantics as currently defined. (OTOH, it might be possible to define an encoding of nested contexts using reification and some derivative of containers as currently defined by M&S, and attach the extended semantics to that syntax, in which case it might fall well within our scope of clarifying M&S.) #g -------------------------- __ /\ \ Graham Klyne / \ \ (GK@ACM.ORG) / /\ \ \ / / /\ \ \ / / /__\_\ \ / / /________\ \/___________/
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:44:01 EDT