On 2002-01-28 15:38, "ext jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com" <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com> wrote: > [...] > >> What S requires (as you yourself have pointed out) is that there is one >> literal node for each literal label and that has one interpretation. If >> multiple meanings are needed that is up to the application semantics. >> >> What TDL requires is that different occurrences of literal nodes with the >> same label have different meanings. It is an implementation detail how >> literals are actually store, but the clearest exposition of the TDL position >> is that the graph is untidy. Anything else is mere sophistry. I agree. > that's a good summary Jeremy > > -- > Jos I agree with that, too ;-) Patrick -- Patrick Stickler Phone: +358 50 483 9453 Senior Research Scientist Fax: +358 7180 35409 Nokia Research Center Email: patrick.stickler@nokia.comReceived on Monday, 28 January 2002 09:42:22 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:44:01 EDT