At 04:42 PM 1/24/02 +0200, Patrick Stickler wrote: > > I really meant to say: > >> <"10",2> > >> <"10",10> > >It's probably clearer to indicate that these mappings >are within the scope of a specific datatype, e.g. > > BinaryNumber("10",2) > DecimalNumber("10",10) Trouble is, that's not what Jeremy's proposed MT says. (All this is really emphasizing, to me at least, why it is so important to have a proper formalism... I think I now understand what is being proposed. Thanks for providing that, Jeremy.) #g ------------------------------------------------------------ Graham Klyne MIMEsweeper Group Strategic Research <http://www.mimesweeper.com> <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com> __ /\ \ / \ \ / /\ \ \ / / /\ \ \ / / /__\_\ \ / / /________\ \/___________/Received on Friday, 25 January 2002 08:28:14 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:43:59 EDT