Patrick Stickler wrote: > > I've not seen any comments to my earlier proposal > > 'literal' the RDF/XML string representing an rdfs:Literal > 'lexical value' member of lexical space of "some" datatype > 'data value' member of value space of "some" datatype > .... > Eh? > > Patrick Patrick, I know Pat's already replied to this but I must just point out that this proposal must rule itself out on lexical grounds alone (regardless of its `value'). You've used `value' three times, once in the fundamental sense of a `value space' and then casually in a term for the other side. I also note you use `data' three times but I can only object to that on aesthetic grounds. I'd humbly suggest we restrict the use of `value' to `value space' items and use `lexical' only for syntactic items and use `data' as a free radical for both. That jumbles up your table rather messily, I'm afraid. Martyn -- Martyn Horner <martyn.horner@profium.com> Profium, Les Espaces de Sophia, Immeuble Delta, B.P. 037, F-06901 Sophia-Antipolis, France Tel. +33 (0)4.93.95.31.44 Fax. +33 (0)4.93.95.52.58 Mob. +33 (0)6.21.01.54.56 Internet: http://www.profium.comReceived on Thursday, 24 January 2002 10:08:42 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:43:59 EDT