W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > January 2002

Re: TDL Model Theory

From: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 22:16:57 +0000
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20020123221509.00aa2be0@joy.songbird.com>
To: "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
I was too quick on the send key.  When I said:

>Something thing that is bothering me about this is:  the interpretation of 
>a Unicode node is stated in such a way that there may be several 
>literal-value pairs that could be denoted.  Do you mean the interpretation 
>in this case to be ambiguous?  Suppose that data types BinaryNumber and 
>DecimalNumber are recognized, then a node labelled "10" can denote:
>    <BinaryNumber,2>
>    <DecimalNumber,10>

I really meant to say:
>    <"10",2>
>    <"10",10>

#g



------------------------------------------------------------
Graham Klyne                    MIMEsweeper Group
Strategic Research              <http://www.mimesweeper.com>
<Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
        __
       /\ \
      /  \ \
     / /\ \ \
    / / /\ \ \
   / / /__\_\ \
  / / /________\
  \/___________/
Received on Wednesday, 23 January 2002 17:44:55 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:43:58 EDT