W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > January 2002

Re: use/mention and reification

From: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 12:10:02 +0000
Message-Id: <>
To: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
Cc: RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
At 01:46 PM 1/23/02 +0200, Patrick Stickler wrote:
> >  OTOH, without allowing
> > that it seems that URI-refs don't offer anything that label strings like
> > "Lois" and "Jimmy" don't also offer.  The point of my comment was to
> > suggest that matters relating to personal belief of identity shouldn't
> > really be expressed in terms of URIs.
>But your examples are not about belief of identity, they
>are about belief of properties of entities which are given
>I.e., you weren't saying that <person:Lois> <ex:accepts> that
>"Superman" <ex:is> <person:Superman>.

My take on this scenario was that Lois' non-belief that Clark Kent is 
strong is rather bound up with her belief about the identity of the person 
she knows as "Clark Kent";  i.e. that she does not recognize him as also 
being the person she knows as "Superman".

I think some alternative formulation of this scenario could lead to a 
situation in which Clark Kent and Superman have universally accepted 
denotations, and URIs may then be appropriate.  In this case, I think that 
it's not possible that they denote exactly the same thing;  e.g. Clark Kent 
denotes a person X wearing a suit and glasses;  Superman denotes the same 
person X wearing a natty blue-and-red number.  In this formulation, using 
URIs seems less troublesome.


Graham Klyne                    MIMEsweeper Group
Strategic Research              <http://www.mimesweeper.com>
       /\ \
      /  \ \
     / /\ \ \
    / / /\ \ \
   / / /__\_\ \
  / / /________\
Received on Wednesday, 23 January 2002 07:15:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:53:54 UTC