W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > January 2002

Re: literal value terminology (was: Re: Review of MT)

From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2002 10:10:56 +0200
To: ext Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>, Sergey Melnik <melnik@db.stanford.edu>
CC: RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <B86EF6B0.BE01%patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
On 2002-01-19 3:05, "ext Pat Hayes" <phayes@ai.uwf.edu> wrote:


> I(literal token) = datatype value

But literals are not necessarily "tokens" in the common person's
typical understanding of tokens.

I think that 

    I(literal) = datatype value

is the clearest.

RDF M&S speaks of literals, not literal tokens, literal values,
literal strings, lexical forms, etc. and it would be good IMO
to follow that terminology as much as possible, if folks are
to easily relate the different sibling specifications/documents.

Eh?

Patrick


--
               
Patrick Stickler              Phone: +358 50 483 9453
Senior Research Scientist     Fax:   +358 7180 35409
Nokia Research Center         Email: patrick.stickler@nokia.com
Received on Saturday, 19 January 2002 05:17:38 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:43:56 EDT