At 10:51 AM 1/18/02 -0600, Pat Hayes wrote: >>IF one has a schema language that can define datatypes >>AND one uses that language to define the characteristics of some datatype >>THEN the RDF datatyping scheme should not preclude the use of dada types >>so defined. > >Well, just so long as they are not actually surreal. I guess dada is OK, >but I draw the line at melting watches. I'm all for a flexible notion of time :^) #g -------------------------- __ /\ \ Graham Klyne / \ \ (GK@ACM.ORG) / /\ \ \ / / /\ \ \ / / /__\_\ \ / / /________\ \/___________/Received on Friday, 18 January 2002 13:31:45 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:43:56 EDT