W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > January 2002

Re: Datatyping desiderata, take 2

From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 08:35:21 +0200
To: ext Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>, Martyn Horner <martyn.horner@profium.com>
CC: RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <B86D8EC9.BCBD%patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
On 2002-01-18 0:43, "ext Graham Klyne" <GK@NineByNine.org> wrote:


>> Also, I lost the point of the list of idiom examples: idiom B and idiom
>> P are shown to be the same (modulo prefix). Have I missed something?
> 
> No, you didn't miss anything.  I didn't merge them (yet) in case some
> idiomatic differences between B and P emerge in subsequent discussions.  I
> think there might be some more complex combinations of statements that
> don't work in the same way under those proposals.

As I pointed out, P and B cannot be merged. The semantics
of the rdfs:range values are significantly different. They
do not express the same knowledge, and I would suggest that
the examples for A and B follow the S conventions using
'.map' and '.lex' suffixes, or that all idiom examples
be omitted from the "common" desiderada document and
addressed solely in each proposal.

Cheers,

Patrick

--
               
Patrick Stickler              Phone: +358 50 483 9453
Senior Research Scientist     Fax:   +358 7180 35409
Nokia Research Center         Email: patrick.stickler@nokia.com
Received on Friday, 18 January 2002 01:34:30 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:43:55 EDT