W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > January 2002

Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-01-18

From: <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 16:26:20 GMT
Message-ID: <3113816.1011284735292.JavaMail.bwm@MCBRIDE-B-4>
To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Time:
10:00:00 Fri Jan 18 2002 in America/New York

which is equivalent to
15:00:00 Fri Jan 18 2002 in Europe/London

Phone: +1-617-761-6200 (Zakim)#7332
irc: irc.openprojects.net #rdfcore

1: Allocate scribe


2: Roll Call


3: Review Agenda


4: Next telecon - 10am Boston time, 25 Jan 2002


5: Please register for the face to face meeting.

See:
  http://cgi.w3.org/Register/selectUser.pl?_w3c_meetingName=techplenary2002


6: Review Minutes of 2002-01-11 with correction

See:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Jan/0095.html
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Jan/0097.html


7: Confirm Status of Completed Actions

ACTION: 2001-12-14#3 Jeremy Carroll
Review Model Theory WD

see:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Jan/0094.html

ACTION: 2001-12-14#8 Jan Grant
look at #rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr closely

see:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Jan/0043.html

ACTION: 2002-01-11#3 bwm
Ensure we have an issue to clarify the semantics of reification

see:
  http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-identity-of-statements

ACTION: 2002-01-11#4  bwm
update the rdfms-replace-value issue with text based on Aaron's proposal

see:
  http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-replace-value

ACTION:  2002-01-11#5 DaveB
remove rdfms-replace-value from the list of issues affecting the syntax

see:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Jan/0099.html

ACTION: 2002-01-11#9 graham
Publish a list of desiderata for data typing (Start from Sergey

see:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Jan/0091.html

ACTION: 2002-01-11#10: bwm
add item on registering for F2F to telecon agenda for 18/Jan/2002



8: Reification
Time to reactivate discussion?


9: Status of Test Cases WD
ACTION: 2001-11-30#3 Jan Grant Get access to test case areas of W3C site
ACTION: 2002-01-11#2  JanG  post summary of Test Cases WD outstanding updates to list.
ACTION: 2002-01-11#1  bwm  persue CVS access for Jan with EM



10: Status of Primer


11: Model Theory WD
Actions:
2001-12-14#2  Jos De Roo        Review Model Theory WD
2001-12-14#2  Patrick Stickler  Review Model Theory WD

This will be an urgent reminder to folks to complete their review.


See:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2002Jan/att-0007/01-RDF_Model_Theory.htm
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Jan/0000.html
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Jan/0094.html


12: Unrecognised xml: attributes
Propose:  

The WG resolves that unrecognised attributes in the xml namespace
should be ignored.



13: Issue: #rdfms-xml-base
See DaveB's excellent summary of the discussion to date - url below.

Propose:  

  The WG confirms it's previous decision that where RDF is
  embedded in an XML document, and that RDF is within the scope
  of an xml:base, then then an RDF parser will use the value of
  the xml:base attribute as the base for resolving relative URI's.

  The WG confirms its previous decision that xml:base attributes
  within an RDF/XML document will be ignored.

  The WG actions DaveB to reflect these decisions in the syntax
  document.

  Action ??? to create test cases to reflect these decisions.

  This is be closed.


See:
  http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-xml-base
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Jan/0098.html


14: Issue: #rdfms-nested-bagIDs

Summary:
   The Model and Syntax specification does not clearly specify which
   reified statements are put in which bag when nested description
   elements have bagID's.

Propose:

  o  the WG resolves: 

  Nested rdf:Description elements with rdf:bagIDs generate the same
  triples as top-level rdf:Description elements with rdf:bagIDs.
  Specifically, triples generated as a result of nested
  rdf:Description elements do not get included in bags associated
  with outer rdf:Description elements.

  o the WG approves test cases 1 and 2 in DaveB's message - url below

  o this issue be closed 


See:
  http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-nested-bagIDs
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Jan/0113.html


15: Issue: #mime-types-for-rdf-docs

Propose

  o the WG authorize DaveB to add text as outlined in his proposal - url below

  o this issue be removed from the list affecting the syntax WD


See:
  http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#mime-types-for-rdf-docs
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Jan/0114.html


16: Issue: #rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr
Discuss Jeremy and Jan's proposals.


See:
  http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Jan/0018.html
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Jan/0034.html


17: Datatypes
2002-01-11#6  miked  to drop an example of both approaches (implicit / explicit) to datatyping to the mailing list.

Status.


See:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Jan/0109.html
  http://www-nrc.nokia.com/sw/TDL.html



------------------------------------------------------------
This agenda was produced by Jema, the Jena WG assistant
Received on Thursday, 17 January 2002 11:26:38 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:43:55 EDT