I don't think this came through fully clearly when I proposed it during the teleconf, so I'll repeat it again. I think that we should partition the Datatyping discussion documentation into separate documents: 1. Desiderata (as already done by Graham) 2. MT Foundation (sections 2-3 of Sergey's document) 3. Proposal: S 4. Proposal: PD 5. Proposal: ??? The rationale for this is that we all seem to be in agreement with regards to #1 and #2 above, and also, those two serve as the basis of comparison of the various proposals. Also, since #1 and #2 are mostly complete, we could offer them to RDF Interest for review and comment while we continue our definition, refinement, and debate about the different proposals. I propose that we finalize documents #1 and #2 this week and provide them to the community for comment -- comments which may be invaluable both for the definition and refinement of the proposals, which will be published shortly thereafter. Eh? Patrick -- Patrick Stickler Phone: +358 50 483 9453 Senior Research Scientist Fax: +358 7180 35409 Nokia Research Center Email: patrick.stickler@nokia.comReceived on Tuesday, 15 January 2002 02:57:19 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:43:54 EDT