W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > January 2002

Re: Question about "cohabitation" of S idioms A and B

From: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 18:53:46 +0000
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20020111185233.03901d90@joy.songbird.com>
To: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
Cc: RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
At 06:39 PM 1/11/02 +0200, Patrick Stickler wrote:
>On 2002-01-11 18:07, "ext Graham Klyne" <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
>wrote:
>
> >> The examples I used were based on those given in Sergey's definition
> >> of the A and B idioms. Perhaps there are errors there?
> >
> > Unlike Sergey's similar example, you have used the *same* URI (ex:age)
> > for
> > each idiom.  Sergey's examples of A and B use 'exA:birthdate' and
> > 'exB:birthdate', so the problematic entailments do not arise.
>
>Ouch. I missed that. So, two separate ontologies depending on idiom.
>
>Yuck!  I say again. Yuck!
>
>;-)

Not different ontologies, just different names for the types concerned.

#g


------------------------------------------------------------
Graham Klyne                    MIMEsweeper Group
Strategic Research              <http://www.mimesweeper.com>
<Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
        __
       /\ \
      /  \ \
     / /\ \ \
    / / /\ \ \
   / / /__\_\ \
  / / /________\
  \/___________/
Received on Friday, 11 January 2002 14:02:35 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:43:54 EDT