I see the need to clarify my meaning when I refer to P, P+, D, U, etc. in recent discussions. I am not speaking about the earlier, entire proposals -- including their expectations/requirements in the MT -- but only to the idioms they represent for expressing the typing of literals in the graph. In all such cases, I am talking about the (lexical_form, data_type) pairing model, previously referred to as PDU or just PD, as defined in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Nov/0579.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Jan/0060.html I apologise if this has caused any confusion. With the exception of S ;-) if in the future I mean to refer to the entire earler proposal, including those parts relating to the MT, I will say so clearly. Otherwise, I am referring only to the idioms as they relate to the PD model. Regards, Patrick -- Patrick Stickler Phone: +358 50 483 9453 Senior Research Scientist Fax: +358 7180 35409 Nokia Research Center Email: patrick.stickler@nokia.comReceived on Friday, 11 January 2002 03:48:26 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:43:54 EDT