W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > January 2002

RE: RDF datatyping

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 12:06:09 -0000
To: "Patrick Stickler" <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>, "ext Graham Klyne" <GK@NineByNine.org>, "Sergey Melnik" <melnik@db.stanford.edu>
Cc: "RDF Core" <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <JAEBJCLMIFLKLOJGMELDCEMBCCAA.jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>

> I don't see how the S proposal serves to provide a solution which the
> present practices/idioms P & D (DAML) do not provide -- therefore there
> is no justification for adopting what is a more complex solution for a
> problem that it is already fully solved by present practices.
(not as strongly felt).

> Am I alone in this thinking?

Received on Thursday, 10 January 2002 07:06:34 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:43:53 EDT