W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > August 2002

Draft: Summary of Responses to request for input on datatypes tradeoff

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 16:10:09 +0100
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20020820154803.02957c50@0-mail-1.hpl.hp.com>
To: RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>

This is a draft of the summary of responses to the request for 
input.  Comments to me please so I can send it out.  If there is little 
discussion, I'll probably send it Thursday.  If there are substantive 
comments I'll hold off till after this weeks telecon.

Brian

===================================================================

First, thanks to everyone who has responded to the request for input.

    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2002Jul/0045.html


Secondly, I'm sorry for the delay in sending this summary, caused by my 
taking a little vacation.

Responses:

    Prefer A to be yes:  2
       http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2002JulSep/0061.html
       http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2002JulSep/0079.html

    Prefer D to be yes: 8

       http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2002JulSep/0021.html
       http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2002JulSep/0028.html
       http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2002JulSep/0045.html
       http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2002JulSep/0022.html
       http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2002Jul/0075.html
       http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2002Jul/0078.html
       http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-logic/2002Jul/0096.html
       http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2002JulSep/0062.html

    Responses I'm unable to interpret one way or the other: 0

    That's a dumb question: 5
       http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2002JulSep/0039.html
       http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2002JulSep/0054.html
       http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2002Jul/0059.html
       http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2002Jul/0047.html
       http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2002JulSep/0061.html

    Suggested Alternative Approaches:

       Consider defining literals to denote *sets* of values.
       http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2002JulSep/0033.html

       Have two different kinds of equality
       http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2002JulSep/0023.html

       Require the syntax to be precise about the value that is intended
       http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-logic/2002Jul/0069.html
       http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2002JulSep/0024.html

Brian
Received on Tuesday, 20 August 2002 11:13:13 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:50:27 EDT