Any volunteers to check this over from an RDF perspective? Brian >Resent-Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 16:33:25 -0400 (EDT) >Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 16:29:31 -0400 >From: "Ian B. Jacobs" <ij@w3.org> >Organization: W3C >User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0rc2) >Gecko/20020513 Netscape/7.0b1 >X-Accept-Language: en-us, fr-fr, it >To: www-tag@w3.org >Subject: 13 Aug Arch Doc available for review >Resent-From: www-tag@w3.org >X-Mailing-List: <www-tag@w3.org> archive/latest/2020 >X-Loop: www-tag@w3.org >Sender: www-tag-request@w3.org >Resent-Sender: www-tag-request@w3.org >List-Id: <www-tag.w3.org> >List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/> >List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:www-tag-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe> >X-MailScanner: Found to be clean > > >Hello www-tag, > >The TAG invites your comments on the latest draft >of the Architecture Document [1]. The TAG expects >to publish a first public Working Draft (on the >TR page) of the Architecture Document in a few weeks >and would like material feedback on the current draft. > >The TAG does not commit to responding to every comment; >this is not a formal call for review. The usual TAG >policy [2] regarding email on this list is in effect. > >Please be concrete in your comments. Propose alternative >language. Avoid sustaining long threads. > >Chapter 1 ("Identifiers and Resources") may deserve the >most attention -- it has received a lot more attention >from the TAG than the other chatpers. On the other hand, >concrete suggestions for how to structure the other >chapters could also help us improve the first public >draft. > >Thank you, > > - Ian > >[1] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2002/0813-archdoc >[2] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/#tag-attn >-- >Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs >Tel: +1 718 260-9447Received on Wednesday, 14 August 2002 07:07:09 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:50:26 EDT