W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > April 2002

Re: The place of rdfs:Literal's in the world...

From: <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 10:10:52 +0200
To: patrick.stickler@nokia.com
Cc: bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com, phayes@ai.uwf.edu, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <OF3463DC16.1B893DF7-ONC1256BAB.002A29EE@bayer-ag.com>

> > > [...]
> > > If y'all want it to actually be the set of literals, then we would need
> > > to re-think this whole issue.
> >
> > Is there a problem here?  I just heard Pat say no.
>
> I thought he asked a question. I didn't hear a 'no'.

I'm perfectly happy with rdfs:Literal being the class
whose members *denote* literals (quoted character strings
which denote themselves and which are member of LV)

--
Jos
Received on Tuesday, 30 April 2002 04:40:10 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:47:39 EDT