Re: The place of rdfs:Literal's in the world...

> > > [...]
> > > If y'all want it to actually be the set of literals, then we would need
> > > to re-think this whole issue.
> >
> > Is there a problem here?  I just heard Pat say no.
>
> I thought he asked a question. I didn't hear a 'no'.

I'm perfectly happy with rdfs:Literal being the class
whose members *denote* literals (quoted character strings
which denote themselves and which are member of LV)

--
Jos