W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > April 2002

Re: Clarification of charmod-uri

From: Aaron Swartz <me@aaronsw.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 13:55:44 -0500
To: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
CC: RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>, Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Message-ID: <B8F30160.33904%me@aaronsw.com>
On 2002-04-29 05:49 AM, "Graham Klyne" <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com> wrote:

>> 1) Is there some reason why these Unicode characters cannot be %encoded? I
> The reason I heard was that the I18N group would like the user's original
> character input to be preserved as much as possible.  If %-encoding is
> applied, it's not possible to tell if the user supplied it of the application.

This doesn't make any sense to me. Why would the application introduce
%-encoded characters, and if it did, couldn't it introduce them even if the
URI was not %-encoded?

[ "Aaron Swartz" ; <mailto:me@aaronsw.com> ; <http://www.aaronsw.com/> ]
Received on Monday, 29 April 2002 14:55:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:53:57 UTC